Debate between Fair Value Accounting (FVA) and Historical CostAccounting (HCA): A Literature Review

Authors

  • Md. Kowsar Hamid Author
  • Shamima Nasrin Mukta Author

Keywords:

Fair Value Accounting, Historical Cost Accounting, Investors Intention, Assets Volatility

Abstract

Accounting is an information system as well language of business. Due to globalization and regulatory pressures, accounting has to
serve different purposes, so as to modify itself regarding principles, valuation techniques, and something like that. To satisfy the
interested parties, FASB and IASB have been announced a new principle to measure some assets and liabilities of the companies
through fair value model alongside with traditional historical cost model. From the inception of fair value model, some researchers
welcome it and some were not. For many significant reasons, fair value model has been criticized. In this paper, an extensive literature
review has been conducted to unveil the debate between FVA and HCA. It is found that, both methods have appeal in their own field
depending on the interests of the users of the methods. Nevertheless, the authors choose fair value accounting over historical cost
accounting in this study.

Author Biographies

  • Md. Kowsar Hamid
    Joint Secretary, Bangladesh Accounting Association
    Treasurer, Chittagong University Teachers Club (Town)
    Associate Professor, Accounting, University of Chittagong, Chittagong-4331
  • Shamima Nasrin Mukta

    Assistant Professor
    Department of Humanities
    Chittagong University of Engineering & Technology (CUET)

Downloads

Published

07/02/2025

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Debate between Fair Value Accounting (FVA) and Historical CostAccounting (HCA): A Literature Review. (2025). The Chittagong University Journal of Business Administration, 35. https://journal.cu.ac.bd/cujba/article/view/volume35-article1